Subscription
Insufficient Funds
Stripe

Tzachi Davidovich
Jan 14, 2026
Somewhere right now, a customer’s card just declined with “insufficient funds”… and a subscription is quietly trying to ghost you.
No breakup text. No dramatic “it’s not you, it’s me.”
Just poof -your MRR takes a tiny hit and moves on with its life.
And the worst part? This is the kind of churn that feels “normal,” so teams treat it like weather:
“Declines happen.”
“Cards expire.”
“Nothing we can do.”
Which is a shame, because a lot of failed payments are recoverable. Not with wishful thinking — with systems.
Failed payments are awkward… but predictable
Failed payments aren’t one thing. They’re a messy family reunion of:
Insufficient funds (the “I swear I had money yesterday” decline)
Expired card (the classic)
Lost/stolen card (new card, same customer, chaos ensues)
Do not honor / generic decline (the “computer says no”)
Authentication failures (hello, SCA)
The customer usually didn’t wake up and decide to cancel.
They just… didn’t successfully pay.
Which means you’re not fighting “cancellation.”
You’re fighting friction + timing + follow-through.
That’s good news — because those are fixable.
“Stripe + hope” is not a strategy
Most subscription businesses have some version of:
Retry the charge a few times
Send an email or two
Pause the service
Eventually cancel
And that can work… kind of.
But this is where subscriptions start ghosting:
retries aren’t optimized by decline reason or timing
messages are generic
recovery paths aren’t frictionless
teams don’t notice patterns until churn shows up in a dashboard weeks later
You don’t need more emails. You need smarter recovery.
The psychology of “insufficient funds” (aka: customers are not villains)
When a card declines with insufficient funds, the customer is rarely thinking:
“Yes. This is the moment I end my relationship with this SaaS tool.”
More likely, they’re thinking:
“I’ll move money later.”
“I’ll deal with it tomorrow.”
“Why is this happening?”
“Wait, what’s this charge?”
And tomorrow turns into “never,” because humans are:
busy
forgetful
allergic to admin tasks
very good at procrastinating anything that feels mildly annoying
So your job isn’t to nag.
It’s to make it stupid-easy to recover.
What actually reduces “subscription ghosting”
Here’s what consistently moves the needle for failed payment recovery:
1) Retry like a grown-up
Not “every 24 hours at 2am.”
Retry based on:
decline reason
past success patterns
time-of-day / day-of-week
issuer behavior
2) Make the update path frictionless
If your “update payment method” flow feels like a tax form, you’re toast.
Customers should be able to fix it in seconds:
fast link
minimal steps
mobile-friendly
no login hurdles if possible (secure, but not painful)
3) Treat declines differently
“Expired card” is not “insufficient funds,” and neither is “do not honor.”
Same workflow for all declines = leaving money on the table.
4) Don’t wait for churn to tell you a story
If you only notice involuntary churn in a monthly churn report, you’re already late.
The win is recovery before the customer experiences disruption.
So… are your subscriptions ghosting you?
If you’re running subscriptions, you’re losing revenue to failed payments.
That part is inevitable.
But treating it as unavoidable? That’s optional.
A good recovery engine doesn’t feel like “more dunning.”
It feels like fewer awkward moments, fewer cancellations that weren’t really cancellations, and more customers continuing exactly as they intended.
Which is the ideal relationship, really:
No drama. No ghosting.
Just paid invoices.

